The Myth of the Golden Hour, Part III

In Part II in the series we discussed an overlay method that improves definition in the highlight areas of the image.  Part II was published on January 22, and Part I was published on January 13.  In this installment, we will consider a method for enhancing contrast by application of a curves adjustment layer.  Our working image is shown below.

Currently, we have three layers: the top layer is a copy of the original unprocessed copy of the image in darken mode, a middle layer  overlay layer, and the original image on the bottom.  Let’s flatten the layer by opening the Layers submenu (click the downward point arrow in the upper right hand corner of the Layers tab) and selecting the Flatten option.

Then copy the resulting Background layer to generate a new Background copy layer.

A curious condition of RGB images is that the contribution of the red, green, and blue channels to the luminosity (contrast) present is not equal.  We will leave a technical discussion for why this is so for a future entry, but in fact the green channel is most important, followed the red channel and then the blue channel in the ratio 6:3:1.  This suggests that we could delete the blue channel and retain 90% of the current image contrast – it’s true!

To review the contribution of the individual channels we open the Channels menu, select Window on the Photoshop top menu bar, and then select the Channels item from the drop down menu.

By selecting the individual Red, Green, and Blue channels in the CHANNELS tab in turn, we can see what each of these elements brings to the overall image – note that when a channel is selected, the channel indicator turns blue ( assuming default Phot0shop behavior).

Select the red channel panel to activate only that channel.

Select the green channel panel to activate the green channel only.

Finally, select the blue channel panel to activate the blue channel.

Careful review of the individual channels confirms that they are all about equal in terms of providing elements of contrast to the image.  This will not always be the case, especially in images recorded in red rock country.  In this case, the most straightforward approach to improving contrast will be to apply curves adjustment to the individual red and green channels (the blue channel may be adjusted, but in practical terms, such adjustments have minimal impact).

Begin by conducting a merge-copy by typing <cntl><shft>alt>e (<cmd><shft>alt>e on the Mac)  This merges the current three layers into one layer, and then copies that layer on top of the others.  We could have simply flatten the three layers and then copied the result, however the merge-copy gives us a bit of additional flexibility, e.g., we could always delete the merge-copy layer and then rework the darken or overlay layers.

So that we can remember how all the current layers were generated, let’s rename them by selecting (double-click) the text in the LAYERS tab.

We now load the red channel by selecting that channel in the CHANNELS tab, and then apply a curve to the channel by typing <cntl>m (<cmd>m on the Mac).

Notice that I have steepened the curve near the maximum on the right hand side of the histogram (note that I have rendered the histogram so that it displays the amount of light – this is the default setting, however I usually rig it to show % pigment/ink).  The right side of the histogram is where the luminosity of the lighter rock surfaces is represented, and steepening the curve in this region increases contrast in the rocks.

We apply a curves adjustment to the green channel to further enhance the contrast in the rocks.

Since we are working in RGB color space, luminosity and color are intrinsically tied together.  Thus the curves we have applied to the red and green channels generate not only a change in luminosity (contrast in the BW sense), but also a color shift.  We can fix this easily by simply changing the blending mode of the Merged-copy Layer to luminosity to produce the contrast-enhanced (only) image shown below.

Compare this image (above) to the one we started with in this entry (below).

Next, we merge-copy to generate a new layer on top, and change the blending mode of the new layer to multiply.

Finally we adjust the opacity to until things agree with our vision of the place, about 60%, to finish up this lesson.

This was a long discussion, perhaps too long for most.  Anyway, I hope you find it useful.  Send questions if you got ‘em.  There is a quote by Edward Weston that I favor: “Photography to the amateur is recreation, to the professional it is work, and hard work too, no matter how pleasurable it may be”.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

The Myth of Golden Hour, Part II

The image we will consider in this entry is the often-photographed Horseshoe Bend site near Page, AZ.  The overlook is located about 6 miles south of Page on US 89, at the end of a 0.75 mile hike (one-way) over rolling sandy terrain.  The final processed image is shown below.

The source image (shown below) was was recorded on July 22, 2009, at about 14:40 MST, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED lens at 27mm.  Exposure was f/16 and 1/125s, ISO 200.  Minimal processing of the RAW image was conducted during the conversion.

The image exhibits the anticipated washed-out attributes that we would anticipate given the time of day at which the image was recorded.  In this instance, as we so often find, photographing this amazing scene during the Golden Hour is simply not tractable, since long shadows would fill the canyon, generating an uninteresting image.  Our only option is to record the image when the sun is relatively close to its zenith, and hope to enhance detail and color post-capture.

Below, I include a screen capture of the ACR Raw conversion interface below to illustrate that although the image it pretty washed out, the histogram indicates that things aren’t too bad – this is common is images recorded near midday on sunny days.

There are several things would should like to improve.  The clouds on the horizon are attractive, but a bit blown out.  There is dramatic color variation, but it definitely could be much better.  Specifically, both contrast (luminosity) and color variation would be improved by both darkening the sandstone surfaces throughout the image and by expanding the subtle range of color present.

We’ll tackle the clouds/sky issue first.  We begin by copying the Background layer to generate the Background copy layer.

The next move is difficult to motivate, but the results are compelling.  Apply the blue channel of the RGB image to the R,G, and B channels in Normal blending mode – select  Image > Apply Image…   Note that the Invert box is checked – this is important.  See the dialog box and resulting image below.

Not yet clear where this is headed?  Try changing the blending mode of the Background copy layer from Normal to Overlay blending mode as shown below.

Although you may be able to see that we have increased definition in the clouds, the image still looks pretty strange., and specifically there is an odd loss of resolution throughout most of the image  We clear this up by blurring the Background copy Layer.  Make certain that the Background copy layer is selected (the layer icon will turn blue if you are using default settings).  Then select  Filter > Blur > Gaussian Blur…  The Gaussian Blur dialog box will appear, and allow you to vary the radius parameter.

The proper setting of radius depends on the resolution of the image.   As you increase radius, the image will gain back the original resolution of the source image, but the clouds – and – other highlight regions of the image – will have improved definition.  For this 12MP image, I had to apply the maximum value, 250 pixels, twice.  The Photoshop engineers definitely need to increased the range of the radius parameter to accommodate current and future image sizes.  The resulting image is shown below.

Careful comparison between the working image shown above and the original image indicates that the Overlay procedure has left the image much lighter.  We restore the original luminosity by first copying the Background image to generate a new layer named Background copy 2, and then draging that new layer to the top of the layers stack as shown below.

Of course, since the blending mode of the new layer is Normal, the view you now have of the image is exactly the same as when you started – placing any image with blending mode set to Normal  at the top of a layer stack simply displays that image.  Things get interesting when you convert the blending mode to Darken as shown below.

The influence of the processing becomes clear when we view a section of the sky as shown below – original image on the upper half.

Note that not only has the definition in the clouds improved, but the canyon walls have also been enhanced.  This is a good stopping point for the current entry.  Stay tuned for part III.

One final note.  I didn’t invent any of the methods discussed in this entry.  My approach is a combination of a wide range of influences, including ideas discussed by Martin Evening, Bruce Fraser, Scott Kelby, Dan Margulis, Deke McClelland, Jeff Schewe, Rov Sheppard, and a number of others – all of the folks listed by name publish excellent texts on image processing and are well worth owning.

An image of the Horseshoe Bend area is shown below courtesy of Google Earth Imaging.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

Midwinter at Farmington Bay

Snow on the ground…fog in the air (or is it still that inversion)…Farmington Bay is a starkly beautiful place this time of year.  The proper name of the area is the Farmington Bay Waterfowl Management Area, and it is administered through the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.  The WMA is located about 25 miles north of Salt Lake City, UT, just a couple of miles off of I15, and just outside the city of Centerville.

The image above, of a Bald Eagle resting on a snag, was recorded on January 17, 2010 at about 13:00 MDT.  This eagle did not move from its roost during the three or so hours that we were in the WMA.  The eagles winter here, but don’t expect to see them flying around too much.  Apparently this loafing behavior is part of their effort to conserve energy.

The eagle image was captured using the Nikon D3s and the AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 200-400mm f/4G IF-ED lens at 240mm.  Exposure was f/8 and 1/1250s, ISO 200.  Image converted to BW using Nik Silver Efex Pro.  The NIKKOR 200-400mm is the newest hardware acquisition, and was on test for the first time today.  All of the images recorded for this entry were recorded with the D3s/200-400mm setup.

We saw several Great Blue Herons (the one above scarcely visible).  Curiously, all but one of these were hunting, e.g., doing that stealth walk thing they do, not in the water, but on the snow covered marsh.  Although I had normally thought of Herons as dining exclusively on fish (or water bugs and such), apparently they will go after small terrestrial critters when the situation calls for it.  The image above was recorded at 13:43 MDT.

American Kestrels are among my favorite birds – not only for their coloring, which is lovely, but mostly for their behavior.  You may find them calmly perched as above, but when they are active, they execute a most remarkable behavior.  They will fly up next to the road to an altitude of about 50 or 60 feet, hover for a few seconds, and then dive close to the ground.  They repeat this antic three or four times and then fly off.  They are among the least skittish birds, and often seem content to perch very near the road.  Image recorded at 14:00 MDT.

The image above is a Northen Harrier.  My initial estimate was that this might be a juvenile bird, but I have still a lot to learn.  Jack Skalicky, good friend and expert birder, adds the following: ‘It might be an adult female as most winter juvenile birds (2009 hatch year) would have a more rufous/orange in the chest, belly, flanks, and vent. This plumage is very bright. The streaking on this bird on a light background suggests an adult bird. I’m not sure of the molt timing in Northern Harriers but if they molt early in Utah this could easily be a first winter bird.’  Thanks Jack!  The image was recorded at about 14:40 MDT.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

It might be an adult female as most winter juvenile birds (2009 hatch
>>year) would have a more rufous/orange in the chest, belly, flanks, and
>>vent. This plumage is very bright. The streaking on this bird on a light
>>background suggests an adult bird. I'm not sure of the molt timing in
>>Northern Harriers but if they molt early in Utah this could easily be a
>>first winter bird.

Save Your Edits!

A key element of processing images for contrast enhancement and color correction and enhancement is tracking what works well.  To accomplish this, you will need to record all the adjustments you make on your more challenging/succesful projects.  Fortunately, Photoshop will easily sort all of this out for you.  After experimenting with a number of variations, I suggest the following.  Begin by opening the General Preferences dialog box by selecting  File > Preferences > General:

Activate history logging  by selecting the History Log check box.  Next direct the log to the file metadata by selecting the Metadata radio button.  Finally, select Detailed from the Edit Log Terms pull-down menu to record a complete record of the adjustments.

To review the your adjustments, select File > File Info…, and advance the tab to the History panel.  The History panel will provide a sequential list of literally every adjustment made to the processed image.  It may take you a little while to get the hang of interpreting the history dialog, but soon you sort it all out.

Any adjustments made in the image processing are now automatically saved in the image file.  Just a little effort in reviewing why things seemed to look better goes a very long way.  At any rate, feel free to check for more practical hints on converting your captures into excellent final processed products.

The Myth of Golden Hour, Part I

The Golden Hour is a classic photographic nutshell that recommends that the best times for recording images are approximately the first hour after sunrise, and the first hour prior to sunset.  This concept is so neatly set in the minds of photographers that it has come to suggest that high quality images can only be recorded during the Golden Hour intervals.  The point of this series of entries is not so much to debunk the idea, as to provide a practical example of  the relatively facile and powerful modern digital processing methods.

We should first consider what it is about the Golden Hour that make this time so special for recording photographic images.  During the Golden Hour, the angle of the sun with respect to the horizon is small, certainly less than 15°, so that the light directly from the sun travels a greater distance though the atmosphere; which reduces its intensity, and also produces characteristically relatively long shadows.  Moreover, the relative contribution to the overall light intensity from the sky is enhanced.  This sky light is characteristically extremely diffuse, e.g., think of the sky as the ultimate light diffuser.  In terms of the color of the light, the longer path traveled by the light leads to a relative decrease in the blue component due to dispersion, leaving a relative enrichment in yellow and red components.

On the day that the image shown above was recorded, August 28, 2009, sunrise occurred at approximately 06:50 MST.   The image was recorded at 10:45 MST, well outside of the Golden Hour, and exhibits the overwhelming highlights and deep harsh shadows that are characteristic of images recorded near mid-day.  The image was recorded using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED lens at 44mm.  Exposure was f/16 at 1/125s, ISO at 200.

The image is pretty washed-out/over-exposed.  Although we might have been able to do more with an exposure at -0.67 EV, there is little doubt that this image would most probably be more appealing, at least in the classic photographic sense, if it had been recorded between 19:00 and 20:00, since sunset on this date occurred at 20:00 (the image was recorded looking westward, e.g., into the rising sun, not a tractable shooting scenario).  The problem was, as it often is, that I wasn’t there during the Golden Hour!  Moreover, obviously most life occurs at sometime other than during the Golden Hour.  Is there anything we can do to add more pleasing contrast and color saturation to such images?  I certainly think so, otherwise I would have written this entry!

Let’s begin with a simple fix, which is to add a new layer on top of the original layer, and change the blending mode of the new layer to ‘Multiply’.  Begin by dragging the Background layer to the copy layer icon, thus generating the Background copy layer as shown below:

Now change the ‘blending mode’ of the Background copy layer to Multiply as shown below – note that the pull-down menu tab contains a number of blending options – select the downward pointing arrow to the right of ‘Normal’ underneath the Layers tab to reveal them.

The result is shown below.  I’d suggest that there may be no simple move that produces such a dramatically improved result as the addition of a Multiply-layer to a washed-out or overexposed image:

Finally, we can vary the extent of the blending of the top layer into the bottom layer by adjusting the opacity of the top layer.

I hope that you have found this entry to be useful.  Good luck on your own efforts.  Keep shooting, and don’t believe ‘em if they tell you you can’t make solid scenic color images outside of the Golden Hour.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

A Rainbow Turned to Stone

A visit to Rainbow Bridge National Monument is one of those trips that proves the adage about the  journey being as important as the goal.  To be sure, it does take a bit of commitment to get to the Bridge, e.g., a five-hour, 50 mile, boat trip over Lake Powell, but it is a day that will fill your skull with most excellent memories.

The bridge is 294 feet high, measured from the base to the top of the span, and 275 feet wide.  The top of the span is 45 feet thick and 33 feet wide.  One of world’s largest natural spans is thus curiously massive.  Recall that bridges are distinct from arches in that bridges are formed by the action of flowing water, in this case carving out Navajo Sandstone.  The bed of the ancient river that formed the bridge is still very apparent, but in recent history the only significant water that you might find in it comes from the (sometimes) rising waters of Lake Powell.

The composite, highly processed, HDR image above was recorded at approximately 16:45 MST on August 28, 2009, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED lens at 19mm (FX).  Exposure was f/16, and shutter speeds to cover 4 EV.  Two source images were generated using Photomatix Pro 3.2.7: one was created using the Tone Mapping method, and the other generated using on Detail Enhancer method.  The two images were blended together using Photoshop CS4.  My goal was to generate a final image that captured the sense of magic about the place, and for this reason I allowed the fanciful, illustrative feel of the Detail Enhanced HDR image to show through a bit.  GPS coordinates at the position where the images were recorded were 37,4.7403N, 110,59.9628W.  GPS positions in this entry were all made using the Nikon GP1, which pretty much lives on the D700.

The image above, of Wahweap Marina at Lake Powell, was recorded at 10:43 MST, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm lens at 44mm.  Exposure was f/16 at 1/125s, ISO 200.  Coordinates were 36,58.485N, 111,29.3835W.

We began our trip to Rainbow Bridge out of Wahweap Marina aboard the Desert Shadow.  There are both all-day and half-day cruises to the Bridge, and we opted for the half-day afternoon adventure that left at 12:30 and returned at ~18:00 (MST).  It’s not inexpensive at over $120 per person, but it is a good value.  You can also hike to the Bridge, but it is a long trip (+10 miles), and you are required to obtain a permit from the Navajo Nation.

The image above was recorded at 13:40 MST, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED lens at 24mm.  Exposure was f/16 and 1/250s, ISO 400.  Coordinates were 37,0.4536N, 111,27.4542W.

The boat trip itself is terrific.  The weather is reliably beautifully warm and dry, and the speed of the boat generates a lovely breeze on board.  The rock formations along the former course of the Colorado River are stunning, and constantly changing.  I could recommend the cruise alone.

At buoy 49 the boat ducks into the narrow and winding Forbidding Canyon, that leads in about 2 miles to a large floating courtesy dock that is maintained by the NPS.  The dock connects to dry land about 2 miles from the Bridge.

The image above of the HP about to traverse between the Rainbow Bridge trail and the boat dock, was recorded at 17:00 MST, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S 14-24mm f2.8G ED lens at 22mm.  Exposure was f/16 at 1/50s, ISO 800.  Coordinates were 37,4.7644N, 110,58.0831W.

The image above, of Dominguez Butte and the Crossing of the Fathers, was recorded on August 28, 2009, at 18:20 MST, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED at 24mm.  Exposure was f/11 at 1/500 and ISO 400.  Coordinates were 37,2.3442N, 111,17.2227W.  This image was recorded late in the afternoon on the return trip to Wahweap Marina – beautiful light.  It would be nearly impossible to tell at the scale at which the image is rendered, but the moon lies just a bit above dead-center.

And finally, here’s an image of the HP and the Dude, near a rainbow turned to stone.

An NASA image of Rainbow Bridge National Monument taken by the Iknonos satellite appears below:

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area

If you ask a native Portlander for directions to Sauvie Island, you are likely to be greeted first with a curious expression, and then a question – ‘Do you mean, Sauvie’s Island?’  I suspect that you could hand a guy the map of the area, stand him underneath the sign for the Island turn off, and he would still claim confidently that it’s ‘Sauvie’s’.  Possessification is just one of those cultural things that sticks hard.

The image above of a bare oak tree with Mount St. Helens in the distance, was recorded at 09:45 PDT on December 26, 2009, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED at 70mm.  Exposure was f/8 at 1/500s, ISO at 200.  Those of you with eagle-eyes might notice that there is an eagle perched up in the oak tree.

The image above – as well as the rest of the images in this entry – were recorded on December 26, 2009 using the Nikon D3s and the AF-S NIKKOR 600mm f/4D ED-IF II fitted with the AF-S Teleconverter TC-14E II (840mm FX).  Minimal processing, e.g., a bit of Clarity was applied in the RAW conversion and light sharpening was applied to the final images.  No cropping was used in the processing of these images.

December 26 was a hunt day, and we heard the pops of shotguns all day.  At this time of year, access to non-hunters is pretty restricted – if I was to pay a return visit, I might actually suit up just to get a bit closer to the animals.  On this visit we spotted several Bald eagles, a few hawks (exact species unknown)*, and a few hundred Canadian Geese.  All-in-all a terrific winter exploration.

One of the most interesting creatures on the Island on this day was a most excellent gent, who was a virtual font of knowledge about the local wildlife.  He sported a tidy set of overalls inside of a Carhartt jacket, and a fabulous big white beard.  This guy would have been an awesome stand in for Santa Claus – just super actually, wait, it just occurred to me, what if…

Finally, a shout out of thanks to Brian P for arranging the rental of the Nikon AF-S 400mm and 600mm lenses – a complete blast!

** Note added on 1/5/2010:  Jack Skalicky, a good friend and expert birder has provided a positive ID on that juvenile bird in the shot above: “It’s a buteo for sure. I see a speckled dark belly band on the perched bird, a dark head, dark underside of primaries, and a fairly clear black ‘patagial patch’ on the underside of wing and at leading edge (about middle of wing). This pretty much clinches a Red-tailed Hawk. A first-winter bird will NOT have red in tail but instead a very fine banding. This is not obvious from the images but everything else is consistent with Red-tailed Hawk.”  Thanks, Jack!

The image below of Sauvie Island appears courtesy of Google Earth Imaging:

It’s a buteo for sure. I see a speckled dark belly band on the perched bird, a dark head, dark underside of primaries, and a fairly clear black ‘patagial patch’ on the underside of wing and at leading edge (about middle of wing). This pretty much clinches a Red-tailed Hawk. A first-winter bird will NOT have red in tail but instead a very fine banding. This is not obvious from the images but everything else is consistent with Red-tailed Hawk.

The Residents of Oaks Bottom

Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge is a 170 acre floodplain wetland on the east bank of the Willamette River in PDX, just north of the Sellwood Bridge.  The Refuge is home to a wide variety of birds, including water and shore birds, woodlands birds, and on occasion, birds of prey.  Today, the only residents that seemed to be at home were a small band of ducks – a group of Mallards and a pair of American Wigeons.

A day without rain this time of year in PDX is like a dog that speaks: very rare.  A sunny day this time of year in PDX is like a dog that speaks Norwegian: even rarer!*

Of course a visit to The Bottom is rewarding any time of year, but on this visit we were on a mission:  to put the new Nikon D3s and the 600mm NIKKOR f/4 lens on test.  The D3s is the newly released version of the D3, while the AF-S NIKKOR 600mm f/4D ED-IF II is the predecessor of the current VR-enabled 600mm telephoto lens.  The 600mm was rented from Pro Photo Supply, an excellent full-service camera shop.

There are several access points around the refuge.  The best of these, at least on this day, was from the trail that exits the north corner of Sellwood Park, and runs along the main lake underneath Sellwood Blvd.  These Mallards seemed to be virtually unaffected by my presence, although they did notice when I cracked up the frame rate.

Swimming around amongst the Mallards was a pair of American Widgeons, one of which is shown below. They sailed around a bit and then disappeared into the reeds.

The images in this entry were recorded on December 24, 2009, between about 11:00 and 13:00 PDT, using the Nikon D3s and the AF-S 600mm f/4 fitted with the AF-S Teleconverter TC-14E II (840mm FX).  The teleconverter adds a full stop to the f/4, bringing it to f/5.6, but retains full autofocus.  The shots were made at either f/5.6 or f/8, ISO at 200.  Minimal processing – no cropping applied.  The D3s is magic, a clear improvement over the already extremely impressive D700/D3 image engine.  The 600mm lens is just awesome.  The current VR version is currently unavailable – as soon as it is – Get in the shopping cart!

*Those of you of a certain age will recognize that the speaking dog bit is adapted from Black Adder III, episode 2.

A map of the Oaks Bottom area appears below courtesy of Google Earth:


What the Mule Deer Know

Mule Deer

Nature still communicates with us…  I have no idea why actually, since we aren’t very friendly.  No matter, a small group (four) of Mule Deer crossed down the greenway about mid-day, and stopped  in the backyard of Casa Don Pedro.  We’re at 5000 ft here, and along a conduit that connects the back-country with the tasty grasses in lawns and parks in the upper avenues.  The slope flattens out a bit here, and the deer often congregate, presumably to rest and take stock of their situation.

Mule Deer

The weather reports are predicting a winter storm tonight/tomorrow, and this visit confirms that estimate.  This group will find a quiet place somewhere way in the back among the firs, and wait until dark.  Under the veil of darkness they will continue down into town.

Mule Deer

The images in this entry were recorded on December 12, 2009, at around 12:30 MDT, using the Nikon D300 and the AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED.  Converted to BW using Nik Silver Efex Pro.

Shores of White Sand

White Sand Dunes and the San Andres MountainsWhen I was invited to present the group research at the Southwest Regional ACS meeting, I jumped at the opportunity, knowing that it would be an excellent opportunity to share results.  I also recognized that this would be an excellent chance to explore the extreme  southern corner of of the southwest.  The region has for good reason acquired mythic status, with unparalleled natural beauty juxtaposed with the history of atomic weapons development, and alien invasion.  What area can compete with this roster of weirdness?

The image above of gypsum dunes with the San Andres Mountains in the distance was recorded on November 6, 2009 at 12:15 MST, using the Nikon D200 converted to IR and the AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED at 17mm (25mm FX equivalent).  Exposure was f/16 and 1/80s, ISO 200.  The image was recorded near the Heart of the Sands picnic area.

It’s not on the way to anywhere…  Again, perhaps for good reason.  The White Sands Missile Range (WSMR); which entirely encompasses White Sands National Monument (WSNM), is the largest military installation in the US.  WSMR is the home of the ultimate big boom, and the Trinity Site* was host to the detonation of the first weaponized nuclear device.  We should remember the date…July 16, 1945.

Picnic Shelter, White SandsThere are two large picnic areas in the Monument.  Each is abundantly populated with corrugated aluminum shelters.  There were no picnickers on this afternoon, and I really gotta wonder…  This image was recorded at 12:30 MST, using the Nikon D200IR and the AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED at 24mm (36mm full-frame equivalent).  Exposure was f/16 at 1/80s, with an ISO of 200.

But about the monument itself…  The ‘white sand’ is actually not sand at all, but in fact gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate).  Unlike silicon dioxide (silica) which is clearly not soluble in water, gypsum is, and thus large surface bearing gypsum deposits are exceedingly rare.  The difference is obvious the instant you get into the monument.  I’m pretty certain you can actually taste the salt in the air, and of course the  feel of the terrain is quite unlike that of sand dunes – much firmer.  The monument lies within the  Tularosa Basin, which like the Great Salt Lake, and other areas within the great basin region, has no outlet to the sea.  Thus, gypsum dissolved by rain falling from the surrounding San Andres and Sacramento Mountains becomes trapped within the basin, and the solution collects in pools that eventually deposit the crystalline form of gypsum, known as selenite.   Shores of white sand in a desert basin.

Salt Cedar DomeThe image above was recorded 13:30 MST, using the Nikon D200IR and the AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED at 19mm (28mm FX equivalent).  Exposure was f/16 and 1/60s, ISO 200.  The castle-in-the-sand in the upper right of the image results from the presence of plants (Salt Cedar in this instance), which produce root structures that hold water and therefore bind gypsum.  Some of these are very large – the one in the image was about 20 ft tall.

So, is that sand/gypsum really white?  As you can see for yourself in the self-portrait of the artist, it is very white indeed!

Portrait of the Artist

Finally, a statement from the bully pulpit…  I realize that Highway 70 and WSNM are both inside of the WSMR, but I object to the presence of the US Border Patrol Station located a mile or so east of the entrance to the monument.  Inside the borders of the country, it is simply unacceptable to be asked whether I am a citizen, and having answered in the affirmative, to be asked my reason for being at a particular place, my destination,  the origin of my journey, and several other questions that are of no reasonable interest to US Border Patrol.   Does anyone really think that an inland Border Patrol Station is quite what Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he suggested that ‘The price of freedom is eternal vigilance?’  Nah, I think Benjamin Franklin stated the concern regarding internal security most clearly long ago, ‘They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.’  The voluntary compromise of our freedom is far more dangerous than any attack our enemies might conceive.  Right, I did say that it was ‘mostly’ on matters of photography…

* The precise origins of the name Trinity Site are lost to antiquity, but our best guesses reveal the complexity, and ultimately, the sadness of the main protagonist, J.R. Oppenhemier.  Much has been written about Oppenheimer and his relationship with Jean Talock, interested readers will find much to indulge their curiosity…