Find Moose, Find Water

I’ve been reviewing images recorded over the past year, and adding keyword and captions using Photo Mechanic (stay tuned for a review).  In the process of reviewing images I noticed that without a single exception, in dozens of encounters with Moose, I always find them either in or very near water.

The images of the bull Moose were recorded at around 15:00 MDT on August 8, 2010 near Jackson Lake Lodge in Grand Teton National Park, using the Nikon D300 and the AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED lens at 300mm (450mm effective).  Exposure was f/8 at 1/200s, ISO 400.  There were literally hundreds of people observing this Moose.

Moose are the second largest land animals – only Bison are larger – and bulls can grow to nearly 7 feet in height and weight over 700 lbs.  The Moose found in the western lower 48 states is the Shiras subspecies: Alces alces shirasi (A. a. shirasi).  Apparently, the salient behavior of the Moose is dominated by the dietary needs of the animal, which are, unsurprisingly, extraordinary.  Adult Moose need to consume around 10, 000 calories per day to maintain their body weight.  In addition, the need for sodium supplementation in their diet motivates them to engage in two characteristical behavioral traits.  First, as aquatic plants contain relatively high amounts of sodium, Moose seek out such plants and are thus often found in or near water.  Secondly, where natural sources of salt are unavailable, Moose will favor man-made sources of sodium, which largely consist of excess salt found near the edges of roadways.  The proximity of Moose and cars often to disastrous results for both the driver and animal alike (a recent car-Moose encounter in northern Utah is described here).

The images of the cow (above) and bull (below) were recorded at around 10:00 on September 23, 2010 near the bridge just east of the Moose Visitors Center, Grand Teton National Park, using the Nikon D3s and the AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 200-400mm f/4G IF-ED lens at 400mm.  Exposure was f/8 and 1/1250s, ISO 1000.  As with the Moose we saw early in the year near Jackson Lake Lodge, there were were literally hundreds of people viewing these two animals.

Copyright 2011 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

Grand Tetons Beyond 830 nm

Photography at Grand Teton National Park presents some challenging timing issues.  Since you will most likely be shooting from a location along the eastern side of the Tetons, your best light will come at dawn, and there are no very good options for late afternoon shooting.  Of course these rules only apply to visible light – head over to the near IR and you open up some excellent additional possibilities.

In my view, and I believe some of the images included in this entry may back me up, the near IR may have some distinct advantages over convention visible light BW rendering .  In addition to the ascetical advantages, there are three significant technical advantages.  First, the haze that is commonly apparently from mid-morning on through dusk is invisible in the IR.  Secondly, excellent captures can be made just about anytime between 10:00 and 14:00, assuming that the cloud cover is minimal.  Finally, since all ‘good photographers’ know that you cannot make decent capture outside of the golden hours, you will have what may normally be crowded locations all to yourself.

The images in this entry were all recorded from points all the Jackson Hole Highway – see the March 7, 2011 entry for more on this most excellent road.  Captures were recorded between 11:30 and 12:45 on August 8, 2010, using the Nikon D200 converted to IR , and the AF-S 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G VR IF-ED lens at focal lengths of between 35mm and 50mm .  The IR conversion was made by Life Pixel, using their Deep BW IR option – equivalent to Wratten 830nm filter.  Images processed using Nik SIlver Efex Pro 2 and Adobe Photoshop CS5.

Copyright 2011 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

 

Nik Silver Efex Pro 2: Contrast Controls

In a previous entry we considered the Brightness controls in Nik Silver Efex Pro 2.  In this entry we consider the other major component of tone control, contrast adjustments.  As with the Brightness controls, the contrast adjustment controls have undergone a significant redesign.

The source image for this discussion, shown above, was recorded at Cathedral Park in Portland, OR, at about noon on February 20, 2011, using the Nikon D3s and the  AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR lens at 165mm.  Exposure was f/11 and 1/40s, ISO at 200.

Processing on the color version of the Camellia included white balance adjustment based on the WhiBal reference card (see the February 25 entry for a shot of the HP holding same), highlight recover in the RAW conversion (+13), and curves adjustments of the red and green channels followed by conversion of that layer to Luminosity blending mode.  Capture sharpening, midtone contrast enhancement, and output sharpening (for web) were applied using PhotoKit Sharpener 2.0 (the new version of PhotoKit Sharpener is really very good).  The version of the image that we will use for a workup in Silver Efex Pro 2 is a minimalist version of the image above, which leaves out the curves adjustment and the midtone contrast enhancement, but adds a Hue/Saturation adjustment to boost the color saturation (+25 on the Master control) prior to BW conversion.

The initial conversion into BW using Nik Silver Efex Pro 2, shown below, produces a very nice starting point – solid initial conversion is a strong point of Silver Efex Pro.

Contrast Tone Controls

In addition to global control of brightness, the Contrast control now has three parametric control elements: Amplify Whites, Amplify Blacks, and Soft Contrast.  For global Contrast as well as for Soft Contrast, the operation range of the tone controls ranges from -100% to +100%, whereas for Amplify Whites/Blacks, the range is from 0% to 100%.

We first consider the effect of the global Contrast adjustment.  I’ll show the versions with the global Contrast set at -40%, -20%, 0%, +20%, and +40%.

For the image below, global Contrast was set at -40%.

 

For the image below, global Contrast was set at -20%.

 

Reference Image (global Contrast set at 0%).

 

For the image below, global Contrast was set at +25%.

 

For the image below, global Contrast was set at +40%.

The global Contrast tone control thus functions as one would image, adjusting the overall contrast of the image.

 

Parametric Contrast Tone Controls

The parametric Contrast tone controls supports enhanced adjustments of image contrast, which as for the Brightness controls, should reduce or eliminate the need to make selective adjustments to image brightness.  To demonstrate the parametric controls,  I’ll again show the reference image, followed by variations in the Amplify Whites, Amplify Blacks, and Soft Contrast parametric controls.

Amplify Whites/Blacks Control

Reference Image: Global Contrast control at 0%, Amplify Whites/Blacks controls at 0%

 

Amplify Whites control set at +40%, Amplify Blacks control set at 0%

The influence of Amplify Whites is to increase the brightness in the darker tones while preventing the highlights from blowing out.

 

Amplify Blacks control set at +100%, Amplify Whites control set at 0%

The effect of Amplify Blacks for the source image is extremely subtle – there is some darkening in the darkest tone, with no apparent change in the lighter tones.

 

Amplify Whites at +40%%, Amplify Blacks at +100%

 

Soft Contrast Control

The official Nik description of Soft Contrast is, well frankly, a little soft:

The Soft Contrast slider’s goal is to provide a different approach to contrast, one that can be less harsh than the effect of traditional contrast. Moving this slider to the right introduces a moody contrast with soft transitions between areas. Moving this slider to the left reduces contrast while still maintaining edge contrasts.

The comment that the Soft Contrast control is less aggressive than the standard Contrast control seems to be accurate, as does the claim that adjusting the slider to the right reduces contrast while maintain contrast nears edges (a pretty subtle effect, but interesting).  The notion of ‘moody contrast’ is a not a very useful phrase though – I’ll try to generate a more quantitative description of the effect.

Soft Contrast control set at -40%

 

Reference Image: Global Contrast control at 0%, Soft Contrast control at 0%

 

Soft Contrast control set at +40%

 

In the next entry, I’ll review the Structure controls in detail.

Copyright 2011 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.